Scientology Research

You are here: Home / Archives for Gerry Armstrong

Gerry Armstrong

by

FBI: Letters to the FBI

FBI records at http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07018.pdf
References a deleted court document of four pages, filed in USDC, Central District of California No. CV 77 2654-Kn (Mex)

http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07019.pdf

http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07020.pdf

http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07021.pdf

http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07022.pdf

http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07023.pdf

http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07024.pdf

http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07025.pdf

http://usminc.org/FBIFILES/SEVEN/07026.pdf

07018-23 and 07026 include correspondence with Scientologists (1985) complaining of religious persecution. The documents evidence Scientology’s frameup operation against Gerry Armstrong, (sometimes referred to by name, and without excision by the FBI) and the videotapes produced by Scientology.

See also: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/illegal-videotaping.html

by

Introduction to The Admissions of L. Ron Hubbard

On 11 March 2000, Gerry Armstrong posted the text of the Admissions1 documents, along with an introduction to alt.religion.scientology. The Introduction follows:

Making Light of Black PR, Part 7, The Admissions of L. Ron Hubbard.

This is my contribution to the celebrations and protests on the occasion of the birthday of L. Ron Hubbard in 2000.

Not all that long ago, someone sent me a copy of the set of writings which follow, written by L. Ron Hubbard in or about 1947. The original of these writings was in Hubbard’s personal archive which I assembled and worked with in 1980 and 1981. I provided the writings to Omar Garrison, a wog ® writer with whom $cientology had contracted to write Hubbard’s “authorized biography.” In 1984 I read portions of them into the record at my trial in $cientology v. Armstrong, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. C 420153. The trial resulted in the widely cited decision by Judge Paul G. Breckenridge, Jr. wherein he described Hubbard as a “pathological liar.”

Omar first called these writings Hubbard’s “Affirmations.” Later, after it dawned on him that Hubbard was a stupendous liar, Omar said he was correcting himself, and thereafter called the writings the “Admissions.” I believe that Omar was right, and that these writings are “Affirmations,” but more importantly, “Admissions.”

I will not now provide anything really of my own analysis or conclusions about Hubbard’s Admissions, because I want every $cientologist or wog ® who reads them to be free, or with negligible influence, to think about them for himself. I will comment below, for legal reasons, on *why* I am posting the Admissions. I have my own experiences, naturally, with these writings, I have drawn my own conclusions about them, and I expect I will participate in a discussion or two they may generate.

I don’t know who in this recent period sent me the copy from which I typed that follows. In any event I would not divulge the identity of the person because of the clear and senseless threat of attack from the people who now run $cientology. It is sufficient for legal purposes to state that the copy I received was not made by me. By the time the Admissions are posted to the internet, I will have, pursuant to the wishes of the person who made it, destroyed the copy I received.

I will also immediately wipe the Admissions from my hard drive. Thus the people who run $cientology will have less reason or justification to raid me or break into my house or computer than they have to raid or break into the house or computer of a million other people.

The Admissions I received are not complete. Perhaps when the kind person who sent me the copy sees they have been posted he will send the rest of the writings. My recollection is that the remainder of the Admissions do not diverge from the substance, direction or tone of what I’m posting here. Included in the remainder is, I think, a deeper delve into Hubbard’s sexual anxieties or aberrations, following the same vein he mined in the part I received. What I received, for example, doesn’t include Hubbard’s startling admission, “It doesn’t give me displeasure to hear of a virgin being raped. The lot of women is to be fornicated.”

I am posting the Admissions for all of the reasons stated in my declaration of January 26, 1997, specifically in paragraphs 57 – 65, which I recently posted to a.r.s.:

From: armstr…@dowco.com (Gerry Armstrong)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Making Light of Black PR, Part 2, January 26, 1997 Armstrong
Declaration for RTC v. Ward.
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 08:12:59 GMT
Message-ID: <38c3687e.235039…@news.dowco.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
NNTP-Posting-Host: tch1c192.chw.dowco.com
X-Trace: 6 Mar 2000 00:14:19 -0800, tch1c192.chw.dowco.com
Lines: 1276
Path: news.vphos.net!tch1c192.chw.dowco.com
Xref: ares.vphos.net alt.religion.scientology:1212275

In that declaration I provided my expert opinion that the exposing or dissemination of $cientology’s “sacred scriptures,” which exposure or dissemination the organization prohibits, suppresses and punishes by commercial, secular copyright and trademark law and millions upon millions of simoleons to lawyer scumbags, is justified by the greater principle of religious freedom. I stated that publication of $cientology’s “secret scriptures” is in my opinion Constitutionally protected religious expression.

Hubbard’s Admissions are quite obviously a part of $cientology’s “scriptures. On the holiness scale ®, they are holier than the holiest of the Advanced Technology scriptures, because the people who run $cientology won’t show them to $cientologists even if they have a half million dollars to pay and agree to the organization implant. Although the Admissions are the holiest of $cientology’s scriptures, the Miscavige regime withholds them for the identical commercial, secular, base and criminal reasons they withhold the “OT” “Levels,” the “NOT$,” and the whereabouts of Xenu’s mountain cave.

$cientology has set no prerequisites or punishments that I’m aware of for $cientologists reading Hubbard’s Admissions, and for that at least I’m grateful. I believe that the Admissions should be read by every $cientologist at whatever point they find themselves on the bridge. $cientologists won’t get pneumonia. They might have some good cognitions. ® They might become free.

The Admissions were very important to me in my getting free of the web of lies Hubbard and $cientology had spun, and getting free of their domination and suppression. I am posting these writings now with the prayer that they help to free other $cientologists from Hubbard’s and Miscavige’s lies, domination and suppression. If Hubbard has been humbled and regained his willfully lost humanity, I know he too would want every $cientologist to read all his Admissions.

Obviously I don’t have any desire to profit monetarily by posting Hubbard’s unpublished Admissions. My desire is that these writings help everyone, $cientologist and wog ®, to make informed and better choices about L. Ron Hubbard and $cientology. I was not freed by being a $cientologist, doing $cientology, and having all the experiences, cognitions and trappings of $cientology. I was freed by reading what $cientologists don’t get to read, by being what no $cientologist would be, a wog ®, by doing what no $cientologist would do, and having my own experiences, cognitions and stuff. I share Hubbard’s Admissions with everyone because God Who created knowledge does not want anyone to be kept ignorant.

I stated in the Jan 26, 1997 declaration that the people $cientology identified as violating the organization’s copyrights and sued – Grady Ward, Lawrence Wollersheim, Keith Henson, Dennis Erlich, Arnie Lerma, Bob Penny — were in general agreement that $cientology is not a sincere, and hence real, religion, but is a criminal cult engaged in harmful practices. I also stated that if these people are correct in their assessment, and if they did expose or publish $cientology’s “secret” documents, they were and are completely justified in having done so.

Repeating what I wrote in the Jan 26, 1997 declaration, “In my opinion this kind of expression is an expected, logical response to Scientology’s efforts to corrupt the meaning of religion in order to “sanctify” its antisocial and dangerous mind set and criminal activities. It is expression which cannot legally be prohibited or punished by judicial process.” I agree completely that $cientology, that is, $cientology as directed by David Miscavige and his regime, is not a sincere, real religion, but a criminal cult engaged in harmful practices.

I could, quite clearly, have posted the Admissions anonymously. I gave it serious consideration, because while I believe these writings, for the peace and health and spirit of so many people, should be posted immediately, I wanted to do what be effective and not the stupid end of martyrdom. I decided against anonymity, however, for a number of reasons. I believe that by U.$., Canadian and international law, and common sense, I am permitted to publish these writings openly. I believe that by common decency, by human and civil rights codes, by being a Prophet to $cientologists (Pt$), and by God Himself, I am urged, in fact directed, to post these writings and post them openly.

I am also posting the Admissions openly to confirm their authenticity. The copy I received was not clear in places, and it is now gone. All words, spellings, punctuation and notations are Hubbard’s, except for brackets [] which are mine. I pray that DM makes the complete original of the Admissions available for $cientologists around the world. Indeed I pray that he reveals every hidden piece of Hubbard’s writings, and yes, even his own secret documents, to all $cientologists and interested wogs ®. Robert Vaughn Young and Stacy Brooks at least have read the Admissions and will be able to confirm that what follows here is, within reasonable parameters, authentic. I was very careful, but if there are any errors at all in what I have posted of the Hubbard Admissions, I urge DM to have them corrected.

Posting the Admissions, I believe, lessens the threat of harm or murder to silence me, but it ups the revenge factor ®. The person who sent me the copy emphatically doesn’t want any trouble. Good Lord, I don’t want any trouble, and I’m the guy who typed this copy and will now post it using my own name to a.r.s. The person who sent the copy certainly knew that I would recognize the writings and I’d like to think wanted me to do with them what I’ve done and what the person was in no position to do. I have not shown what I’m posting to anyone, but I will now email it to certain people when I post it.

I am aware that DM will almost certainly attack me. To justify his and $cientology’s continuing attack, as Hubbard did for his continuing attacks while he lived, they made attack their organizational policy of choice, or scripture of choice I suppose I should say. Nevertheless, perhaps this is a good time for Miscavige to learn that non-attack is the best policy.

I really think the $cientologists would be silly to sue me. Then again I’ve thought they’re silly for years and years and that hasn’t deterred them. But perhaps in this instance they can learn to not do another silly thing. I’m giving $cientology and $cientologists another golden opportunity to stop being silly. It’s God actually Who gives everyone opportunities to stop being silly. I’m but a simple messenger, with staggering inabilities, and at times admittedly silly. Miscavige’s $cientology is willfully silly. Suppression is no accident, it is willful. I am but a prophet who brings $cientologists opportunities to be healed of their willfulness, silliness and suppression.

I am aware that the posting of the Admissions makes a godsent legal test case. If I am guided by God, what I have done not being unsafe or immoral, my post is protected expression because it cannot be denied. Without including God, it is clear that $cientology, $cientologists and their agents (for there are wogs ® who are $cientology’s agents) are themselves responsible for my actions. What they have done to silence me, to 8-C my body from place to place, to invalidate me, to black PR me, to threaten me, to destroy me, has either been a source of my state of mind, and hence my actions, or God has. (I think it can be agreed that the mind directs actions, rather than actions directing the mind.)

If God is directing my actions, how could I do anything else? If DM and his $cientology organization have affected my mind, they bear responsibility for the act about which they might complain. In truth both things are true. God is in control, and DM and $cientology have unclean hands. It is observable throughout history that God sends prophets, and even the unprophetable, to deal with tyrants and regimes whose hands are unclean.

A case can be made that my posting Hubbard’s Admissions is a fair and appropriate response to DM’s dissemination and internet posting of my writing known as the “pig dream.” Obviously I held the copyright to that unpublished work. The pig dream was a glimpse in an extremely literary form into the mind of Gerry Armstrong. The Admissions are a glimpse in a different literary form into the mind of L. Ron Hubbard.

I certainly don’t argue that Hubbard’s Admissions are no more important or vital than my pig dream. There is, after all, nobody paying huge sums of money and spending their lives working for Armstrongology. On the other hand, Hubbard’s dead. DM had his agents post the pig dream to hurt me. I’m posting Hubbard’s Admissions to set $cientologists free. I’ll copyright my portion of this post, and hereby give my permission for it to be copied and distributed.

For fair use purposes, the context for the post containing theAdmissions is the global controversy about Hubbard, about $cientology’s antecedents, about Hubbard’s psyche, his honesty or dishonesty, his mental technology, “Excalibur,” his promises, his aims, his history, his theology, his hypnotism, his navy record, his non-navy record, and other clearly controversial Hubbard-connected conumdrums. The context is the controversy we see every day on a.r.s. and in media around the world.

The period when Hubbard made these Admissions involved John W. Parsons, Sara Northrup, his family, magick, his “development” of “Dianetics” leading to the publication of the book that would make him famous and lead on to $cientology. Funnily, Hubbard and $cientology claim that he was a “Special Officer” for the LAPD in this period and that he was working for the U$ Navy to break up the Parsons “black magic ring.” There is a VA record showing that around the time of the Admissions Hubbard sought psychiatric help.

Just one last thought, which I’ll repeat from my Jan 26, 1997 declaration, and which I pray that DM and his $cientologists take to heart. Although man may attempt to keep God out of his other realms, he surely cannot keep God out of religion, because in this world it is His Realm. That’s sort of the message every prophet brings.

I hope Hubbard’s Admissions are a blessing and a help to all.

© 2000 Gerry Armstrong

Go to The Admissions

by

TV: Secret Lives (1997)

secret06FORREST ACKERMAN – Hubbard’s literary agent:
“He said that he had died on the operating table, and that he rose in spirit form, and he looked at the body that he had previously inhabited and he shrugged the shoulders he didn’t have any more and he thought ‘well then, where do we go from here?’ Off in the distance he saw a great ornate gate, and he wafted over to it, and the gate, as they do in supernatural films, just opened without any human assistance. He floated through and on the other side he saw an intellectual smorgasbord of everything that had ever puzzled the mind of man – you know, how did it all begin, where do we go from here, are there past lives, and like a sponge he was just absorbing all this esoteric information and all of a sudden there was a kind of swishing in the air and he heard a voice, ‘no, not yet, he’s not ready’ and like a long umbilical cord he felt himself being pulled back, back, back and he lay down in his body and he opened his eyes, and he said to the nurse, ‘I was dead, wasn’t I?’. Then he bounded off the operating table – I don’t know how you die, then you bound off an operating table. He got two reams of paper, and a gallon of scalding black coffee, and at the end of two days he had a manuscript called ‘Excalibur’ or ‘The Dark Sword’. And he told me that whoever read it either went insane or committed suicide. And he said that the last time he had shown it to a publisher in New York, he walked into the office to find out what the reaction was, the publisher called for the reader, the reader came in with the manuscript, threw it on the table and threw himself out of the skyscraper window.”

But was Hubbard’s extraordinary story true? Excalibur became the stuff of mystery. Hubbard told friends it was too dangerous to publish. But forty years later, a treasure trove from Hubbard’s early journals and manuscripts, believed to have been long lost, was discovered by his staff.

secret07 GERRY ARMSTRONG – Hubbard’s household manager:
“There were two and a half versions of Excalibur. I read them and I didn’t go mad and didn’t die. They also include the information within related writings, that these came out of a nitrous oxide incident. Hubbard had a couple of teeth extracted, and it was while under the effect of nitrous oxide that he came up with Excalibur.”

Hubbard’s ‘death’ was in fact an hallucination under the effects of anaesthetic. So what was the intellectual dish he’d fed on?

GERRY ARMSTRONG:
“It was not anything particularly revolutionary. The key to Excalibur was this great realisation, by Hubbard, of ‘Survive’ as being the one command that all existence, and all life and all people, have. That became the basis for a lot of Dianetics and a lot of Scientology.”

This idea had a profound impact on Hubbard. In a letter to Polly he wrote ‘I have high hopes of smashing my name into history so violently that it will take a legendary form.’

The Second World War brought a new dimension to the Hubbard legend. He said that while serving in the U.S. Navy he had been blinded, but that inspired by the insights he had first glimpsed when he died on the operating table he had dramatically been able to cure himself.

secret08 HUBBARD IN 1968:
“By 1948 through my own processing, and use of the principles I had isolated up to that time, was able to pass a 100% combat physical, which was very mysterious to the government, how had I suddenly become completely physically well, from being blind and lame.”

It was an odd story, because Hubbard’s war record shows his recurring problem was a stomach ulcer. There are mentions of conjunctivitis, but none of blindness. Indeed, none of his medical reports, before, during, or after the war, contain any suggestion of blindness, only shortsightedness and astigmatism.

After the war, Hubbard went to Hollywood. As a successful science fiction author he was a welcome visitor to the Los Angeles Science Fantasy Association. Its members recalled that there was one power over the mind he undoubtedly did possess – hypnotism.

FORREST ACKERMAN:
“Ron Hubbard came to our club and he hypnotised all of the members except me. I wanted to remain in present time and watch what was going on. I remember it was fascinating, he told one boy he had a little kangaroo in the palms of his hands, and the boy was going all around the room showing everyone this little kangaroo that was hopping around.”

In writings and conversations, Hubbard began to speak of his new science of the mind. As Scientology’s literature would later depict, Hubbard claimed that in addition to himself, he cured eleven other war veterans and restored sanity to forty mental patients. […] 1

Notes

  1. Secret Lives, (1997, 19 November). Retrieved on 28 April 2010 from http://www.xenu.net/entheta/entheta/media/tv/secret/secret.html ↩

by

FBI: Letter from Director William N. Webster to Chairman, Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights Don Edwards (August 6, 1985)

August 6, 1985

Honorable Don Edwards
Chairman
Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights
House Committee on the Judiciary
U. S. House of Representatives
Washington, D. C. 20515

Dear Chairman Edwards:
Your letter of June 3, 1985, requesting FBI review of allegations made by Reverend John Standard III, Director, Office of Public Affairs, Church of Scientology International, concerning “a bizarre multi-agency plan to disrupt the Church of Scientology has been brought to my attention.

The FBI has received other inquiries on this subject. I want to stress that the FBI is not involved solely or on conjunction with other Federal agencies in any attempt to destroy the Church of Scientology. In those cases where a violation of Federal law falling within the FBI’s jurisdiction has occurred, the FBI investigates such situations with complete fairness to all parties involved. The facts are then presented to the appropriate United States Attorney’s office which determines the prosecutive merits of the case.

The particular allegations made by Reverend Standard are based on conversations recorded during “secret” videotaping of a former Church member, Gerry Armstrong, whom Reverend Standard alleges is a “government covert operative.”

Gerry Armstrong, a former church member, has been interviewed numerous times by various Federal investigators and attorneys in connection with pending litigation in this and other Federal investigations. Partial transcripts of Mr. Armstrong’s videotaped conversations have been provided by the Church as an exhibit to various pleadings filed in litigation with the Department of Justice, and they fail to substantiate claims of a counter-intelligence program directed against that group. Conversely, review of the unexpurgated transcripts of those videotaped meetings referred to by Reverend Standard conclusively negates any inference of government conspiracy.

I hope this will be of assistance to you.

[…]

NOTE: Reverend John D. Standard III, Director, Office of Public Affairs, Church of Scientology International, wrote to Representative Rodino, Chairman, House Judiciary Committee alleging “a bizarre multi-agency plan to disrupt the Church of Scientology”, and requested Representative Don Edwards hold hearings on this matter. Representative Don Edwards requested the FBI review Reverend Standard’s allegations. Videotaped conversations of a former Church member, Gerry Armstrong allegedly establish the government-wide conspiracy and have been utilized as exhibits in various pleadings filed by the Church; however, the transcripts selectively omit a pertinent portion of the tape which conclusively negates any inference of government conspiracy. The context of this letter was taken, in part, from similar replies to congressional inquiries. This reply was coordinated with [?] Legal Counsel Division.

[Handwritten] Copies of the transcript of the videotaped conversations of former church member Gerry Armstrong were filed as an exhibit to a motion to vacate summary judgment entered on behalf of the defendants in Founding Church of Scientology v. Director FBI etc. (USDC, DOC, C.A. No. 78-0107). A review of these transcripts by DOJ attorneys and by SA [?] reveals several statements by Armstrong to the effect that the government is “not out to get” the Church of Scientology or any Scientologist. Copies of the full text are in possession of LCD and DOJ Federal Program Branch. 8/1/85